Posts Tagged morgan-stanley

Treasury Makes Changes to TARP

On October 14, 2008, Treasury Secretary Paulson announced that the Treasury will purchase equity stakes in nine top using the first $250 Billion that has been allocated to the TARP Program (See What is the TARP? And, why does it cost $700 Billion?) The nine banks agreeing to these investments by the Treasury are: Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America (including Merill Lynch), Citigroup, Wells Fargo, , and State Street Corp. These banks represent the most financially in the country as determined by the Treasury.

Why are they buying equity stakes in the banks instead of purchasing the troubled assets of the banks?

The econmic crisis has affected thebanking industry so adversely that many people have lost faith in the banks. In order to protect the banks, and restore confidence in the banking system, the government felt it had to make an equity investment in these banks.

The Bush adminstration is greatly conflicted by this decision. President Bush said that this sort of intervention (not seen in this country since the great depression) was “not intended to take over the free market but to preserve it.” added, “We regret having to take these actions. Today’s actions are not what we ever wanted to do — but today’s actions are what we must do to restore confidence to our financial system.”

At a news Bush said, “I’m sure there are some of my friends out there saying, I thought this guy was a market guy; what happened to him? Well, my first instinct wasn’t to lay out a huge government plan. My first instinct was to let the market work until I realized, upon being briefed by the experts, of how significant this problem became.” Paulson added, “Government owning a stake in any private U.S. company is objectionable to most Americans — me included. Yet the alternative of leaving businesses and consumers without access to financing is totally unacceptable.”

The Treasury will also invest on other banks besides the original nine banks mentioned above. These banks will apply to the Treasury and will be picked based on a ratings system that will determine the strength and viability of these banks. The strongest and most viable banks will be the most likely recipients of these investments and weaker banks will be least likely. This may lead to these stronger banks purchasing the weaker banks which will also help the banking system by reducing the number of potential bank failures.

The Treasury has invested $125 Billion in the first nine banks listed above and will use the remaining $125 Billion to invest in the other banks.

Treasury Secretary Paulson believes the government will profit

On October 20, 2008, Paulson said, “This is an investment, not an expenditure, and there is no reason to expect this program will cost taxpayers anything, This program is designed to attract broad participation by healthy institutions and to do so in a way that attracts private capital to them as well.”

Paulson added that this program was designed to increase the investors’ confidence in these banks and will also increase the confidence of the banks to start lending their money instead of hoarding it for reserves. This boost in investor confidence and increase in lending will increase the value of the banks and the equity stake help by the government.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

U.S. Government takes over Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac

Today, the US Treasury took control of home mortgage giants Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac. This is the latest fallout from the ongoing housing and mortgage crisis facing the nation and slowing the economy. According to Henry Paulson, US Secretary of the Treasury, it was a to keep these companies from failing and stabilizing the beleaguered .

fanniemae U.S. Government takes over Fannie Mae & Freddie MacfreddieLogo Lg U.S. Government takes over Fannie Mae & Freddie MacUnder this , the companies will be run by the government and their CEOs will be replaced Monday. They will be placed under conservatorship – which means they will run as independent companies under the supervision of the Federal Home Finance Agency ().

, the head of the , said, “As house prices, earnings and capital have continued to deteriorate, Fannie and Freddie’s ability to fulfill their mission has deteriorated. In particular, the capacity of their capital to absorb further losses while supporting new business activity is in doubt.”

In addition, an audit of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac conducted by Morgan Stanley was ordered by Paulson. Apparently, this audit has revealed very troubling information that led Paulson to believe that this was the only option to save these companies and prevent and even larger crisis in the national and global credit markets. Paulson characterized this action as a “time out” that should help these companies to stabilize.

Parts of the plan call for Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac to actually increase their mortgage holdings in the short term to help further stabilize the mortgage and housing markets. In the long term, though, they will have to reduce their holdings in order to minimize future risk for the companies. Congress will ultimately have to decide the future of these companies.

Ben Bernanke said that he fully supported the . “These necessary steps will help to strengthen the U.S. housing market and promote stability in our financial markets,” Bernanke said.

Although this all seems like horrible news for the mortgage and housing markets (as well as the broader economy) there are some positives to this move. First, this prevents the failure of the mortgage giants and possible the entire mortgage system as we know it. Second, with the government guaranteeing the debt of Fannie and Freddie, many people believe we could actually see rates go down and mortgage become easier to get. Bother of these could help to end the housing crisis and downward spiraling home values across the nation.

We will learn more as the markets open Monday and I will provide updates as I learn more.

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments